有兴趣的可以写邮件给opta，这个是他们邮件：editors@theanalyst.com

视频附件用这个英文版的，邮件内容ai生成就行了，直接把我这段话复制去问你们的豆包，ds，gpt，gemini，claude什么的：

我需要给opta写邮件来对他们的双重标准提出异议。在5月2日的德甲比赛中，奥利塞的射门击中门柱，随后反弹到门将后背导致进球，OPTA给出的结果是算奥利塞进球。但相似的案例中，梅西在今天的美职联比赛中射门击中门柱，疑似反弹门将后背后最终进球。首先这与奥利塞不同之处在于，梅西的这粒进球并没有明显的回弹到门将后背导致进球的视角与证据，极有可能是球的强烈旋转最终导致球入网。另外即使真碰到了门将，那与奥利塞的情况也应该保持一致。但是opta官方却在这两个球上采取了双重标准，算梅西的这粒进球为乌龙球。作为全球最大的足球数据网站，这不可接受，需要纠正自己极为明显的错误。根据此意，写一段得体的英文邮件给opta

参考我的标题与文案：

标题：
Urgent Concern – Request to Review the Inconsistent Goal Attribution (Olise vs. Messi)

文案：
Dear Opta Team,

I am writing to raise a serious concern regarding a clear double standard in your goal attribution for two nearly identical incidents, which is unacceptable from the world’s leading football data provider.

On 2 May, in a Bundesliga match, Michael Olise’s shot struck the post and then clearly rebounded off the goalkeeper’s back into the net. Opta credited the goal to Olise. Today, in an MLS match, Lionel Messi’s shot also hit the post and ended up in the net. Crucially, in Messi’s case there is no conclusive video evidence showing the ball hitting the goalkeeper’s back. Multiple replays strongly suggest the goal resulted from extreme spin on the ball, with no clear deflection. Despite this, Opta has recorded it as an own goal. (See in the attached video).

Even if the ball did make minimal contact with the goalkeeper, the situation would be identical to Olise’s, and for consistency the goal should belong to Messi. The fact that you have applied one standard to Olise and a completely different one to Messi — while lacking definitive proof of a goalkeeper touch in the second incident — is a glaring inconsistency that damages Opta’s credibility.

I respectfully but firmly urge you to review the footage immediately, align your decision-making across both cases, and correct what appears to be an obvious error. As someone who relies on Opta’s integrity, I believe it is essential that your data remains fair, transparent, and consistently applied.

I look forward to your response and to seeing this resolved promptly.

Kind regards,
An independent football data analyst

这段还是建议自己ai生成，这样大家邮件内容会有所小差别，不然就都一模一样的文案了 。另外落款你们自己编，a football fan, a retired football expert, a football fan having 100k+ followers on TikTok啥的都随便。 http://t.cn/AXi6nnie