用户微微一笑886
25-09-29 19:14

#外语交流论坛[超话]#(中英文)
It was originally just one thing. This thing contains water and fire as one, contains water and fire can manifest as two, contains water and fire are compatible, contains water and fire are opposed. It will show various forms. That's its performance. Don't take it seriously.
Why ask the incompatible again? Its nature is that of a thing. It manifests itself as an act based on circumstances. How can you ask if it is compatible or not? Could this be an unexpected complication? Adding more falsehood to falsehood.
True and wonderful enlightenment is the same: Note that "true" and "wonderful" are true and wonderful enlightenment, true and wonderful enlightenment, true enlightenment, true enlightenment, wonderful enlightenment, and wonderful enlightenment. Having understood this truth, all phenomena are nothing but a single thought of mine.

它本来就是一个东西。这一个东西包含着水火是一,包含着水火可以现二,包含着水火相容,包含着水火对立,它会现种种相,那是它表演呐,你不要当真。
云何复问不相容者?它的本性是一个东西,它是随缘变现在演戏,你怎么问它相容不相容?这是不是节外生枝啊?妄上加妄。
真妙觉明,亦复如是:注意,「真」和「妙」就是真妙觉、真妙明、真觉、真明、妙觉、妙明。明白了这个道理,万法无非我一念。

#智慧如海3##杭州妙慧##杭州妙智##大乘妙法莲华经了义法##杭州当强#

发布于 浙江